Factor comparison is a structured method of job evaluation used by HR and compensation teams to determine the relative worth of various roles within an organisation. It involves breaking down jobs into key factors—such as skill, responsibility, effort, and working conditions—and assigning a monetary value to each. These values are then compared across different jobs to establish fair and consistent pay levels.
It is a hybrid method, combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches, and is especially useful for creating an internally equitable salary structure.
Education, experience, and specialised training required for the role
Physical or mental exertion needed to perform the job
Accountability for people, resources, or outcomes
Environment, risks, and other job-related demands
The degree of oversight received or exercised in the role
Each factor is assigned a value, which contributes to the total worth of the job.
Choose benchmark jobs that are well-understood and fairly compensated.
Decide which elements will be used to compare roles (e.g. skill, effort).
Place each benchmark job in order of value for each selected factor.
Allocate currency values to each factor based on market rates or internal pay scales.
Use the same criteria to evaluate and compare all remaining roles.
This process results in a hierarchy of jobs with corresponding compensation that reflects their relative value within the organisation.
Factor comparison is particularly effective in organisations with a wide variety of job roles and a need for structured internal pay equity. It works well for medium to large companies looking to ensure that compensation decisions are data-driven and defendable.
Factor comparison is a detailed and systematic way to evaluate jobs fairly across an organisation. By focusing on specific job-related factors and assigning them measurable value, it helps employers build a transparent and equitable pay structure—supporting both compliance and employee satisfaction.